What are your thoughts on a future where code is represented as a structured model, rather than text? Do you think that AI-powered coding assistants benefit from that?

A slogan that might help you get past the current fads is:

/ \ and ⁄ / | \

Another canonical form could be Lisp S-expressions, etc.

Penguins first-round notebook: Dubas shocks; Kindel, Zonnon and Horcoff honored to join Penguins - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Most coding assistants — with or without “modern “AI” — also do reasoning and manipulation of structures.

in structures, such as:

a b i 1 x []

What baseball stories from the early days of the sport seem too bizarre to be true?

plus(a, b) for(i, 1, x, […])

+ for

First, it’s worth noting that the “syntax recognition” phase of most compilers already does build a “structured model”, often in what used to be called a “canonical form” (an example of this might be a “pseudo-function tree” where every elementary process description is put into the same form — so both “a + b” and “for i := 1 to x do […]” are rendered as

What type of crossdresser are you?

NOT DATA … BUT MEANING!

These structures are made precisely to allow programs to “reason” about some parts of lower level meaning, and in many cases to rearrange the structure to preserve meaning but to make the eventual code that is generated more efficient.

It’s important to realize that “modern “AI” doesn’t understand human level meanings any better today (in many cases: worse!). So it is not going to be able to serve as much of a helper in a general coding assistant.

‘Knives Out 3’ Teaser: Daniel Craig’s ‘Wake Up Dead Man’ Sets December Release Date, Debuts Sinister First Footage - Variety

Long ago in the 50s this was even thought of as a kind of “AI” and this association persisted into the 60s. Several Turing Awards were given for progress on this kind of “machine reasoning”.

i.e. “operator like things” at the nodes …